Neutral Rating

Wait that actually happened??

 

yes that was a thing

 

neutral means you have no opinion. If you have no opinion, why bother stating that? There is literally no point in having a neutral rating.

 

How do you know about this. I dont wanna get derailed but this is quite surprising, in a good way.

 

I've seen it happen, and it was never a thing (obviously) before you could visit islands because at that point the only thing was /tpa. But with the visit thing you could just pop to someone's island and stand around if it wasn't locked.

 

Good point, but if you feel that he/she is in one way good, but in the other way not good, then you would rate it neutral. You're not 100% supporting or not supporting, you're in between.

 

it doesn't change the fact that a neutral RATING is both dumb and pointless to have.

 

if you have something to contribute, say it. if it's not worth contributing, then just leave the thread alone lol you don't need a rating that literally means "i have nothing to contribute"

 

If you both disagree and agree, surely you have enough to say to put it into an actual comment rather than a rating. Also, neutral wouldn't be the way to put it. If you both agree and disagree with something, you're not neutral - neutral implies an impartiality and reluctance to agree with either side of the argument- not BOTH. Neutral is literally the opposite of what you mean.

No support.

 

Been suggested many times and can stop post farming.

 

How would it stop post farming?

 

People will use the rating and people won't just comment Neutral on apps (well if they do it will be decreased)

 

There's a reason it has been suggested so many times and never adopted.

 

Neutral.

Just kidding haha. It's a no from me though, people will rate neutral then go on to comment "Neutral"

 

But how is that post farming?

 

Saying neutral all the time without reason etc

 

Oh. ._.

 

Bump. We need this. typing neutral all the time is annoying.

 

We really don't. If you can't grasp that it doesn't make sense then I don't know what to tell you, but maybe the time that this thread has been up with no new replies and the most recent agreeing that its pointless counts for something.

 

For us to get a neutral rating, we'd need an image as one first. It would have to have the same scheme as the original support and no support.