There's no photo of the person we know as Jesus Christ. Unless Teeeb was referring to the drawings made of him during the Renaissance and beyond. Those drawings of Jesus created are more than likely individual interpretations as to what Jesus might've looked like in their own minds, but they're likely wrong as I doubt Jesus was a beautiful-bearded white European man living in Jerusalem. So in a way, she is correct when stating the fact that there's no photos obviously, nor accurate drawings of Jesus. Proof of species evolving to adapt and survive has been recorded, so Teeeb is correct there.
^^^^ picture doesn't always mean photograph Um cave people been writing on the walls for forever therefore a pic is possible a hand painted pic
Gyazo - 90fec400b262eec0d4f82ffecf673bd6.png Then it's her fault for not clearly stating what she meant. Then go look in the bible for that answer.. I was never contesting the reality of evolution, thats only your assumption lol, where did I say that evolution does not exist.. she didn't say that lol
I don't care who said what. I'm not debating. I gave my own input. You said she's an idiot. Usually, idiots aren't correct, but in this case, Teeeb stated two true statements. Perhaps you shouldn't insult people for simple miswording. It's not really hard to figure out what she meant.
Vintage?? I said pictures but I didn't clearly state photographs or actual drawings. It's ok we all make mistakes. I should've been more clear, I apologize .
The way you said this is like comparing the two as if there's pictures of some sort showing the first stages of whatever evolution theory you believe in, but there's no pictures of Jesus. There's proof for both of them so the message above wasn't really a valid argument
ummmmm if this clears anything up i believe jesus was a person or a leader to certain group of people like he existed but i don't believe in all the magical aspects of his stories
Jesus was a historical figure indeed, but I agree. I don't believe in the stories, and no offense to anyone who does.
Evolution I'm actually baptised as a Catholic I wish I could undo it but sadly I can't :---( I really don't see how there could be a big man in the sky and once have been a man who could walk on water as I get older the idea just seems more and more rediculous to me. Don't get me wrong I think the likelyhood of an 'afterlife' so to speak, is unknown but certainly possible. As humans we like to know the answers to everything and to questions we aren't even ready to ask so we make the answers up *trying to hint something there to special snowflakes*. Perhaps we need to let go of this book that has been around for years, written in a time when people were riddled with fear of the unknown and terrified of uncertainty and just accept present day knowledge. It's a different world now and evolution is absolutely what I believe.
I'd be interested to hear from a/multiple evolutionist/s on how the very first chemicals came to be to cause that explosion, and if the explanation includes random matter flying around then combining and somehow exploding, how did that matter get there in the first place? Everything has a start and there's no way a world this sophisticated could have started from nothing, anyways, It'd be interesting to hear. Basically said 'Its not true because i dont believe it.', At least explain reasons why with proof behind it, saying 'nah that story is a lie sorry everyone but i dont believe this therefore it's fake' doesnt help anybody understand their views and why they dont believe it, I respect you have your own views although having evidence to back it all would result in a stronger argument, which would lead to it being easier to debate, which is the point of this thread.
What evidence is there a human being walked on water? A book written 2,000 years ago when people thought the Earth was flat and there were God's & Goddesses who made everything they know happen?
This isn't what i was adressing, however this is completely up to the faith (not specifically God-believing, just faith in general.) of the person themself. I was requesting opinions on how the world came to be, the second part of my message was a reply directed at queen.
We can't really rightfully do that though since the mass production in China is as massive as it is due to other richer countries, capitalism and stuff
Hm... I get how some may think this is a stage in the natural cycle but I would love to take a part of that research you've made, sources??
