Accepted AceEuro #3

AceEuro
economy
-
yes
yes
I didn't break any rules.
-
Oakk
Yes

I'm requesting Oakk 's supervisor or a super moderator take over this appeal. My last one was closed without explanation when perfectly valid points are raised.

 

I assumed that to mean simultaneously, and since there was no reasoning to you closing the other one, any rational, reasonable human being would allow this one to exist.

 

Also, I find it funny that now you mention rules, but in the other appeal you did not manage to mention a single rule I had broken...

 

Hi staff, 30 hours since this appeal has been up, almost 84 hours of what I believe to be an incorrect mute. Please let me know on the status here, like if you are trying to gather evidence to justify the mute, or just ignoring the appeal, or mentoring Oak on handling appeals, etc...

 

Hello Kerahna, thanks for your reply. I apologise for my recent actions in chat and didn't realize what I was doing may have been against the rules, although common sense should have taken over while I was making chats on the server and stopped myself from making unwanted comments. Thanks, and let me know if there is anything else you require!

 

Also, if what you say here is true, I suggest removing the question "Do you think this punishment was incorrect?" from the appeal format, as it can be misleading.

 

Sure,

• Punished account name: AceEuro
  
• Platform or server punished on: Economy
  
• Have you read the rules? Yes
  
• Do you think this punishment was incorrect? No
  
• Why should you be unbanned? I was not banned, but I should be unmuted because although reading the rules, I decided that I felt I could get away with loopholes in the rules where what I was doing wasn't explicitly stated but the rules still apply. I realize now this was the wrong behavior and I should aim to keep all my chats positive.
  
• If you know, tag the staff member that banned you: Oakk
  
• Do you understand and accept our rules and code of conduct? Yes