I get this might not get many supports because it isn’t necessary and doesn’t change much. &L makes text Bold. I know there is a strike through one and maybe some more but I’m not sure of their codes. I understand why they are not in chat, however they are in books and I feel they should be on signs too.
The bold text would be useful, but the &k was very annoying when it was in classic, sometimes being used to flood chat.
Sure but I don't think &k should be used in chat due to spam. Maybe on island entrance messages, but not in chat.
Still, the use of &k is very annoying and strains the eyes of some, no matter what use. Signs, chat, and books alike are included.
&k would just make tons of lag, signs would have to tick ALL THE TIME compared to normal. Sprock should be able to tell if it would cause lag, cause I ain’t no expert
I support &L I think it would be very useful but I think &k would lag the server. &k is unique because it constantly changes every tick. I think hundreds of signs changing every tick would cause a lot of lag. There is a hopper limit for the same reason. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Support, I’d like &L for the bold text on signs. But as most other people have said, probably not &k due to lag etc.
Support. There's no issue that I can think of with the bold and italics code. Fair enough, the &k one is an eye sore and it would just be annoying to read. I can't imagine a perfectly good reason for someone to put that on a sign. I would definitely use bold and italics on points of emphasis on a sign or for titles on signs, I reckon they'd be really useful - especially for player shops. As for underline, why not? If someone decides to make their whole sign underline then they'll only fit around 5 words on the whole sign! Would also be useful for titles.
Support, I don't see any issue with implementing the bold, underline, and italics code; It would be easy. However, I don't support the suggestion of &K. As other's have said above, it would have no use and be annoying to read.
I like the idea. I think this helps signs be more customizable and nicer looking. Would be great to implement. Support
Support. I’m assuming the server uses essentials to handle colours and formats in chat or on signs, and the option to enable formatting is quite easy and only requires a permission or setting to be changed. However, when enabling formatting, &k is included, so there will need to be a customisation too remove &k from being permitted on signs. As long as formatting is kept to signs only, and no bold or italicised text in public chat were to be implemented, I fully support this suggestion.
