This probably sums up the entirety of this thread. You can build whatever you want on your own island, it's your island. Except the streets are public areas. Nothing is public around this guy's skyblock, so why should he take it down? Because it makes YOU feel uncomfortable? Well, maybe you making him take down his statue makes HIM feel uncomfortable; ever think of that? "I don't want to avoid it and I don't want to ignore it! That's victim shaming, he's cyber harassing me guys, I swear! The 2x2x8 pixelated p***s is offensive to me!" Maybe you should stop feeling so entitled and shrug it off as someone's immature build. It may be stupid, but it doesn't have to be disciplined. Woman up.
You are clearly not keeping up with this thread, The issue at hand is how the staff deal with it and now and not how i feel about it. And thank you to Terrick for adding fuel to my argument by way of griefing my island as can be seen in the image he has posted. Any inaction in regard to this will certainly highlight the double standards set by the staff of this server. With regard to the ongoing of this thread, I've said before, I'm just waiting for Cyp to say his piece as Krissy has suggested. everyone else seems to want to come on here and say their piece.
It's only you that's going on about it. And at 14 you're not exactly a child. Anyway the statue looks like a man having a sword pushed through his mid-drift. The sword has a pink jewel in the hilt. Shame on you for thinking it anything else.
There are worse things children can see... much worse. Is this argument still going on? We have already told you many times there is nothing we can do. People are offering solutions. We keep telling you that out of all the players under the age of 15 on this server, how many will be seeing this island every day? maybe anyone whos island generates there or anyone who gets a /tpa there, but not many people at all. Most of the community and mods have the same view. Unless its culturally or religiously offensive, we cannot remove the structures and you will need to either block it out move. Staff are dealing with this appropriately. Please stop say we are not handling this well.
EVERY post of mine has been in response to someone elses post so you cant say it's me at all. Like I said, I'm waiting for Cyp's response as Krissy has asked, so he is really the only one I believe that should be posting on this.
Krissy, I'm only responding to peoples posts. I'm waiting to hear Cyp's response but it seems everyone wants to weigh in where it is none of there concern. Of course there is now the added issue of the obvious griefing to my island to be dealt with.
I guess Terrick knows the logs aren't working so I dont see the point in that regardless of how obvious it is who did it. Is Terrick big enough to say he did or didn't do this? The webs have been removed by the way.
So you're reporting something that you KNOW is not against the rules because you want to see how the staff reacts? If that's the case, I'm surprised at to why this wasn't locked upon your original posting. Your argument is barely an argument. The staff is clearly not going to discipline something that even you said was not discipline worthy. Well, you know, you did put the thread in the "Discussion" section of the forums... That generally indicates that there is discussion to be had. If you didn't want discussion, you should've put it in a more fitting section. Yes. I don't see your point. So long as the only people seeing his island are those that consent to it, it is fine. As for you, there have already been offers that you build a wall to avoid it from your view, but seriously, you should be mature enough to ignore a 2x2x8 stick. Please stop playing the victim here, and don't try to act smart, it gets you less respect than you started with.
No Sleepy, I made a report first of all before any mod had any input on it. That was closed and I created a thread because I wanted to get a feel for what the general skyblock population think of it. Yes, I did but there are many people coming and commenting not having read the whole thing and their comments are not valid. That is exactly my point, I see the island and I don't consent to it. so by your own reasoning, it's not fine. As for the wall, i've responded to this previously so please refer to that post.