5 Diamond Math Question

Discussion in 'Discussions Archive' started by Jbnorman, Feb 28, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Fastrayman786
    Offline

    Fastrayman786 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2018
    Messages:
    165
  2. Jbnorman
    Offline

    Jbnorman Experienced Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2016
    Messages:
    2,400
    IGN:
    jbnorman
    Michael did first, and gamzee got the prize
     
  3. Fastrayman786
    Offline

    Fastrayman786 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2018
    Messages:
    165
    oh D: lel, it's okay. You might wanna lock this thread tho.
     
  4. RocketOG
    Online

    RocketOG Guest

    Yea, came on specifically to compliment your weird finger.
     
  5. LegoCollecter14
    Offline

    LegoCollecter14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,213
    IGN:
    LegoCollecter14
    Jb, was being rich enough to get people to do your math homework your end goal?
    Because it worked

    27.482

    And yes I know we finished

    Wait jb dude, answer is definitely not 7
    ...
    Imma check something real quick.
     
  6. LegoCollecter14
    Offline

    LegoCollecter14 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Messages:
    1,213
    IGN:
    LegoCollecter14
    Okay I can’t seem to find anyway in which 7 would be true.
    This should be the correct formula
    f(x)= 1*1.2^x

    Having idea halfway thru writing 1 sec...

    Starting to sound like a badly worded recursive function.

    Is it possible we are doing something like

    X. Y.
    1. 1.
    2. Y1+ Y1(1.2)
    3. Y2+Y2(1.2)

    And so on?

    Checking to see if this comes out as 7

    Made a formula
    f(n)=((1.2)f(n-1))+f(n-1)

    Managed to find a calculator that would do recursive.

    C3847885-96C6-464D-A6B8-32698D724DD1.jpeg 81C9A751-72B3-447C-8E3A-4F24B771CF2D.jpeg
    Jb idk what kinda problem this is, but it’s not recursive.
    I’m pretty sure the real answer is 27.482 and that it should be f(x)=1*1.2^x

    Edit; reread question. Recursive technically works and is true, but is so far from 150 that it doesn’t seem reasonable

    Jbnorman i am out of brilliant ideas
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page