These two statements directly contradict each other. If both servers have all the same features, why don't people play on both? Skyblock's player base is certainly big enough. Is it because of use of in-game currency on org? The currency on org is no different than, say, grass, on net. It has a value that fluctuates depending on its demand...to put this in a picture, the price of mob spawners rising from $60k to $125k in the last 6 months means that the value of the currency has decreased. I don't know any numbers, but this would be the same as 1 diamond going from being worth 20 grass blocks to 40 grass blocks—the value of grass blocks decreases in this scenario. The trade system works the same exact way on both servers.

The point I'm getting at is that the servers play the same exact way. So why don't people play on org? It's because it needs some TLC. For example, Spleef. A new spawn. A new market warp. Maybe even spoof up the donor kits a bit to give the economy a jolt. Org needs to have incentive for people to play on it. Net clearly doesn't.

 

They don't contradict each other, it's just that people prefer net. I could list off a bunch of reasons that I play on net rather than org and I'm sure most net players could as well. Org doesn't need anything special, if anything net needs it more since there would be more people using it and it would help keep people on the server. Implementing a game on just org would be outrageous.

edit: You saying people don't play org because there isn't enough interesting things on it makes no sense, because net has all of the same things. People just prefer survival.

 

The servers don't have all the same features. Org is the economy server, with a whole different concept then net. People don't want to play org, so we shouldn't keep trying to get them too.

 

People prefer net. Okay. But don't you dare say to me that org doesn't need it and implementing a game on it would be outrageous. You have no idea buddy. You've been here for a few months. I've been here for over four years.

So you're saying we should just neglect the other half of Skyblock, simply because people don't want to play it? That's some terrible tunnel-vision you got there.

 

Not completely, but almost. Besides that would make perfect sense, if people don't play it, why pay any attention to it at all? But a few people play it, so ofc keep it up and running. I just don't understand why you're so against adding it too both org and net. Org gets plenty of attention for it's size and adding spleef to both servers wouldn't cause it any harm.

 

The whole point is adding appeal to org, whether people prefer net or not. If you add it to both, it defeats the entire purpose...15 players on average are on org at any given time, while that number is 100 for net.

 

If this is specifically for org, somebody should make a suggestion for net as well.

 

If people don't want to play on org, they don't want to play on org. Lot's of people on net and org enjoy spleef and would like it on their server. Instead of putting it on org to force players to play it there, put it on both. Simple as that.

 

Not sure if you can read, but the thread is prefixed with "ORG." Since you don't seem to give a s*** about org, why don't you go make the suggestion thread for net?

 

I'm suggesting adding it to both, while you're suggesting adding it only to org. Are you really in a position to be telling me I don't care about one of the servers? Yeah no, sorry.
My final post on this thread, my point has been made over and over.

 

It's not about forcing players to stay on org. Players will come to org to play Spleef, and then maybe think that they'll check out the server itself and decide to start playing more. Not just in terms of the gameplay, but the community as well. Spleef isn't an infinitely entertaining game anyway, if people decide they don't like org they'll just get bored of Spleef eventually, and stop playing it whether it's on net or org (let me specify that this isn't the case for 100% of players).

 

Oh really? I can't tell you that you don't care about one of the servers?

What about helping to keep people on org? That doesn't matter?

 

Since you're going to ask questions, I'll answer. What matters more than keeping players on .org is keeping players happy on both .net and .org.

 

Well if spleef gives your rewards like the mob arena does, that would be completely unfair for net players. There has been plenty done to try to pull players to org, and they just don't enjoy it.

This isn't about trying to pull players to org. People on both servers just want to play spleef wether it brings more players to the server or not.

I also suggest you stop fighting your cause, because I don't care.

 

Players are already happy on net. That is evident enough in its player base as opposed to org's. It's not to say that net players shouldn't be kept happy, but org needs more focus right now because of the drastic difference in numbers.

 

You're being more repetitive than a Spotify playlist on repeat. I'm done here.

 

Spleef is fun. Support

 

I'm pretty sure I said this already, but the rewards gained are negligible. You can't say it isn't fair because they don't do anything to enhance or hinder the main game/economy.

That's a pretty weak response. While it might debunk adding Spleef entirely, the fact of the matter is that people log onto Skyblock because they want to play Skyblock, not because they want to play Spleef. So no, it isn't about players "just wanting to play Spleef." And if you don't care, get off the f***ing thread. You have no place here.

 

Good one pal. Try to poke a hole in my argument instead of me next time though, alright?

 

This isn't even your thread, you have no place to say I have no place here. I think spleef should be added to both servers, that's that.