Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Demon_Umbreona
    Offline

    Demon_Umbreona Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2015
    Messages:
    362
    IGN:
    Demon_Umbreona
    I think that people that have been banned for stuff like Griefing or Scamming should have a tag r prefix that says GRIEFER or SCAMMER for 1-6 months after the got an appeal depending on how much/bad it was.

    This should be implemented to help prevent people from griefing/scamming and prevent people from getting griefed/scammed.
     
  2. anna
    Offline

    anna Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2015
    Messages:
    3,131
    No. This can lead to public humiliation, and not everyone stays the same after punished. Nobody wants [Griefer], or [Scammer] right beside their name.
     
  3. Malc
    Offline

    Malc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2014
    Messages:
    98
    Being banned is punishment enough imo. If they appeal and get the privilege of being unbanned, I don't think they should have to play with a humiliating prefix next to their name.
     
  4. anna
    Offline

    anna Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2015
    Messages:
    3,131
    ^If mods unban them, they trust them enough not to do it again.
     
  5. Sam
    Offline

    Sam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,458
    Yes, no support, I feel as though this would be terrible for people who didn't know it was against the rules or did it un-intentionally.
     
  6. Love__
    Offline

    Love__ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2014
    Messages:
    2,856
    No support. Not only would this be humiliating, but it is also not needed. Think about it, imagine if you just scammed 1 god item from a player. You are banned for a certain amount of time and when you are back and have learned your lesson, you have to carry that "scammer" prefix around for 1-6 months. In my opinion, that doesn't sound very fair.
     
  7. iBlazeRunner
    Offline

    iBlazeRunner Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2015
    Messages:
    160
    Absolutely no support. I think this would be a horrible idea because of the humiliation. The mods trusted them enough to unban them. They don't need to be overwhelmed.
     
  8. poggers
    Offline

    poggers Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    7,216
  9. TheSugarCane
    Offline

    TheSugarCane Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    2,244
    IGN:
    TheSugarCane
    No support.
     
  10. Bricky :3
    Offline

    Bricky :3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2015
    Messages:
    122
    No support, sry
     
  11. Lemonade
    Offline

    Lemonade Boss Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2015
    Messages:
    10,159
    IGN:
    Lemonade__
    No support, no one needs to be tied up to a pole in the middle of town and publically shamed and beaten with a stick
     
  12. chrix32
    Offline

    chrix32 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,055
    IMHO people would use it to get a "prefix" and be more noticed


    -Chrix32
     
  13. Jess
    Offline

    Jess Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2015
    Messages:
    1,510
    IGN:
    beautiiful
    So basically it's public humiliation, alienation, and then they lose the ability to trade with others. Why don't we put a [stupid suggestions] tag next to your name?
     
  14. Wilbs
    Offline

    Wilbs Helper Helper

    Joined:
    May 21, 2015
    Messages:
    1,507
    Honestly, I see this leading to more problems, being banned is enough punishment. Some people don't want to be publicly humiliated like that and other people with malicious intent will try and get the prefix by purposely breaking a rule. It's really not good for anybody.
     
  15. Nena
    Offline

    Nena Experienced Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2015
    Messages:
    1,166
    Yeah... changing to literally nada support. This creates embarrassment and makes them lose their privilege of exchanging with others. I don't want to start flame but, this is one of the worst suggestions I've seen so far. Do you know how many people are reporting/appealing? The Appeal section gets many threads each day and when they get accepted, the player has to live with a dumb prefix? No, just no. Being banned is good enough for them to learn their lesson like people in jail. Honestly, I think it would create server hate. Once people find out they have this such prefix, they freak out and blame Cyp for adding it. So as you can see, this suggestion is not going to happen AT ALL.
     
  16. Fun
    Offline

    Fun Tyler Jøseph Premium

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    6,174
    no support, nobody want a humiliating prefix. With the prefix, no one would trade with them and they would have it hard. People would make fun of them. When mods unban people, they are pretty much trusting them. There is no need to make people feel bad. This is a server to enjoy life, not to humiliate others when they make mistakes. We're human, mistakes happen. This is not jail lol :p
     
  17. chrix32
    Offline

    chrix32 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2013
    Messages:
    1,055
    Honestly this thread needs to be locked blaq


    -Chrix32
     
  18. Sam
    Offline

    Sam Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,458
    chrix32 the person who made the thread needs to ask for it to be locked
     
  19. Mai
    Offline

    Mai serendipity Discord Moderator Discord Administrator Premium Premium

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2015
    Messages:
    5,103
    No Support. If they were banned, that's enough. Giving them humiliation would do no good to us or them.
     
  20. bERYbERRY
    Offline

    bERYbERRY c000000000000000kies Builder Premium

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2014
    Messages:
    10,459
    IGN:
    BertBerry
    Nope, Just no..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page