Hello all, Below is the link to the paper which I've written concerning the state of the .NET economy. Sadly, it encompasses only about a quarter of what I intended to say. I had originally planned to complete this over the course of six weeks; with the unexpectedly quick release of the server on Sunday February 4th, I was forced to move up the deadline. Therefore, I've put a wrapper on what I've written and have decided to share it with you all now. Please note that I did not have a chance to explore everything I wanted, and that I do recognize it as a very shoddy representation of what could have been a much more thorough work. Thanks, and enjoy! I've left the link open so that you can comment on specific portions of text. Good luck and have fun to you all on the new server. Happy Skyblocking, -PessimismDaily Economic Analysis .Net - Google Docs Also, if you've read it, please leave a short comment at least telling me what you thought of it. I'd like to know how correct it was. You can even just say 'read' if you don't feel like commenting.
Uh Gamer? I Created a much more tidy google forms that i will share with you. It will not have questions, and we can import data and make sections for the new server and the old one. Deal? Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
Accident! Fixed. I might've missed a few people while rushing to get it out before the server release. Thanks for all your help! Good luck on the new server and Happy Skyblocking!
It's good to finally see your work finalised as you have been working on this for a while, I will definitely give it a proper look when I get home!
The significant gap between gold donors and other coloured donors is also largely due to the fact that the other colours have a steady and consistent income of diamonds from kits (1 per day for donor100, 3 per day for donor250, and 4 per day for donor400), whereas gold donors can, primarily, only obtain diamonds through trading with other players. Very interesting paper; well done! I find it tricky to follow size 14 font as compared with standard 11/12pt, but that's probably just me.
This is a nicely written paper. Very detailed and informative, too. It's nice that you've been writing this for a long time, gathering information, etc.
I believe I covered that in the conclusion section. If you had to comment and state this information again, it probably means I was not explicit enough. I'll work on that for my next paper. Thanks!