Okay so I am a liberal because I made a wrong statement about global warming? There's something called making a mistake.
...I did resort to reading through this thread for humor regarding watching little try to talk about politics while waiting for my college prof to show up, but this... I was going to wait to finish to post a comment but after seeing your stupidity about "rich kid" protests and the other bullshit you try to say. It's just comical to see a kid like you acting like a hardass arguing over politics and things you're very ignorant about and sayin you're going to "tear up" a persons response. It's comical how oblivious you are and not able to see anything outside what you want to.
This thread was actually accomplishing some good conversation, but it seems throughout my period of absence on this thread it went to s*** lmao
No what makes you a liberal is the things you support like LGBT I see what I believe in and I'm not acting like a "hardass" I'm telling the Stupid people like Teeeb who seem to not know s***. Anyway Because they were are rich kids protesting in new York Chicago Washington DC Etc. And PS I'd advise not listening to CNN or MSNBC You couldn't think of this if you tried
So you're literally assuming that ALL people at those protests were "rich kids"? And that those are the only places that protests happen? I know multiple people in the cities you listed that protested and non of them even come close to "rich college kids". You even stated you're viewing it from a Christian perspective which makes you look more ignorant than you seem. You're acting like a handicapped child incapable of seeing and throwing a tantrum when you see or read something you don't like. You're assumptions equal those of a 6th grader listening to his parents taking about politics and not having any understanding of them.
I know what I'm talking about because they all looked like rich college kids. How am I acting like a handicapped child??????
You literally just answered your own question. "Looked like"... Are you f***ing serious? You're trying to make an argument and use the term "looked like"? So tell me, what makes a person "look like" a "rich college kid"? I don't see them standing out there in suits and ties with dress shoes. Even if they were that's just dressing professionally? Unless you're assuming people wearing a shirt, jacket, pants, and shoes throws them into the category of "rich college kids".
I'm going to start by translating your message how someone who actually put thought into their posts would have phrased it. "That's the definition of college kids clothes. You're retarded, I lived by Michigan and Michigan state university and that's what they always looked like." Now that I can fully understand your message, here's my response: Read this: He clearly makes a statement that anyone who owns clothes would fit into this category. You then proceed to tell him that the definition of college kids clothes is what literally everyone that owns clothes wears
So you're assuming, because a person has the intelligence level to get into those colleges, it means they're rich? Do you not know of college aid? Grants, scholarships, FASFA? Student loans and debts? Guess you don't know what you're talking about in the slightest otherwise you wouldn't be saying all of that. You literally just discredited your whole arguments because you're making what you saw with your eyes a basis of argument. I have the GPA to attend that school, I've thought of it. It's like a 3.5, does that mean I'd be a rich college student if I went there in my jeans, shirts, jacket and shoes? No, it's literally no different from any college, or any community college. People dress the same regardless of place. Please educate yourself or stop talking. Also, there's no "definition" of college kids clothes. Last time I checked, parents and college grads wore shoes, jeans, shirts, and a jacket if it was cold out. Last I checked kids in grade K-12 schools wore jeans, a shirt, shoes, and a jacket when its cold. Also, I'm an a*****e? Thanks.
If I wanted to say f*** you I would. I'm simply showing how you're making assumptions that can't even be remotely backed up by fact, and yet you're attempting to harass other people about their own, which is comical.