suggestion

I don't think but know there should be an age limit for all mods at age of 17 or older because all these younger kids are just annoying when it comes to rules they are trying to just get unneeded and unearned attention so it'll be nice if there was an age limit thanks p.s. can I get a reason why sand gens are illegal on .org?? At least what I was told by almost all skylords

 

No.

 

If that was implement, we would lose way to many mods, their is about mods 10 I know which are over 17. Also not all mods under 17 are like that.

 

No support.

First of all maturity has nothing to do with age. I've known people over the age of 40 that respond to situations the same way as a common 4 year old.

Second of all if they're "annoying when it comes to the rules" it means that they're doing their jobs. I always compare the mods to police officers, just because it's how I see them. If a cop pulls you over for speeding, sure, it's annoying but it doesn't make them a bad cop. In fact, it makes them a good cop, for doing their job.

Third, there are a lot of mods under the age of 17 and if it wasn't working, things wouldn't be running as smoothly as they are. If the ones under 17 couldn't handle the job, they'd be demoted by now. They must be doing something right.

Fourth, I'm fairly certain that sand gens no longer work, anywhere as they exploited a glitch that was fixed by Mojang.

Fifth, if there was a sand gen that worked, it could be considered illegal as the only way that sand gens can function is by exploiting a glitch. Exploiting a glitch to create duplicate items is called duping and it's against the rules.

 

-.-

 

Well first 40 year old only act like 4 year old if there's a brain malfunction and annoying as in banning ppl to get attention because in the past I've seen mods ban ppl then tell them to post appeal and he will be unbanned ...no point that's a waist of time well for ppl like me that actually build skyscrapers or huge builds 10 year olds IDC how "mature" you think they are shouldn't have the power to ban a person especially that of which that donates money just to play and yes I know rules are rules but not stuff stupid like your kids banning others for trading claiming its looting and just assuming stuff and go on a banning frenzy I see ppl getting banned constantly every hour if older ppl was doing it then there would be less headache of these stupid Lil bans and more serious ppl off the server getting banned at least maybe a secondary mod that can request ban to a primary mod. And the sand gen OK I was just asking IDC really I just heard multi things

 

Your post's logic is so erroneous that I just had to comment.

Firstly, one of my teachers is nearly 40 years old, and he acts exceedingly childish, making inappropriate jokes in school, but does not have "a brain malfunction".

Second, you said that "banning people to get attention" was just hilarious, I couldn't help but rate it as funny. Banning people controls the amount of rule-breakers to the bare minimum, and teaches you a lesson. It's still not a waste of time, as you learn from experiences (I myself have, as well) and you could certainly appeal and get unbanned (again, I have as well).

Third, just because you donated doesn't mean you can bypass any rule. Also, rules ARE rules. If you loot, and a staff member has evidence (i.e. CoreProtect, screenshots, witnesses), you WILL be kicked or banned at the very least.

Lastly, you constantly claim that "older people" wouldn't have this problem of going on a "banning frenzy". Actually, I've seen that younger Mods are less strict (exceptions included). Also, if you were banned, you were banned for a reason. Don't let your selfishness block out that fact in your conscience.

 

*goes through recent threads*
*finds his ban appeal*
No support.

 

OK guys I'm done I'm not gonna continue with 10.13 year olds

 

Shall I lock the thread then?

 

Simple don't like it...just leave..don't make a pointless thread ranting about it..Locking..

 

Would you rather have someone of the age limit you are specifying tell you the exact same thing the others have already said? I assume not.