We are here to show you something that we hope will become a warp and be very useful to skyblock. SkyBank is a place where you can keep your valuables and have anyone of your choice access your Bank chest. As an extra perk, We have heard that you cannot log block enderchests. Therefore you wouldn't need enderchests on the server because you would have a SkyBank. Also, if someone stole, you could check their SkyBank chest instead of being helpless at an enderchest. We have talked to Taylor and Kerahna and they both said that they thought this was a good idea. We also tp random people and 19/20 people said that they loved the idea, 5 of them are already using the SkyBank. We are hoping that cyp takes a look at this and gives us his input and puts it in the comments below. To conclude this paragraph, I would also like to say, this will be a double enderchest instead of one. Thanks to all that came to the SkyBank and for your support with this idea. PLEASE, post your feedback in the comments. THANKS
I agree that this is a good idea but I am confused because they are just normal chests in the screenshot. Is this a plugin or is it yet to be developed?
He meant it is basically like a double enderchest because u could come to sky bank and get ur do of stuff
Yes but it would eliminate situations where someone passes a stolen item because u can log block or inv see and they have no where to put it
Alright, so I'm going to give you my honest opinion here. I don't like this idea at all. Here's why: Enderchests are linked to a single player via there player data. There's no way to share enderchests with someone else. Enderchests can't be combined into double enderchests. That would require a plugin which we don't have. People wouldn't need their own enderchests at the bank, they could all share one, and it would basically ruin the point of an enderchest on your island other than convenience. You can't log enderchests, and if you somehow had the plugin to make double enderchests, I'm fairly sure you still couldn't log them. If you decided to keep these as regular chests, there is now more issues, the first being the number we'd need. There are thousands of logins on .net every day. Imagine needing thousands of double chests and having to keep track of who owns which one. With regular chests, there'd need to be careful protection of the bank that still allowed player to lock their own chests and access them. And constant monitoring to make sure kids aren't just running around locking a bunch of chests. With regular chests, we would be able to log, but let's imagine that lockette goes down. Everything gets griefed, and we now have hundred of pages of logs to get through to get the culprits. Also, I suggest you have the kids with chests on your island retrieve their items. If they want to store their valuables, they should get an enderchest or build a safe area on their island. What would happen to you if their items somehow got griefed/looted after all? Pretty sure they'd all blame you for not keeping their items safe. Not to mention those kids are going to be upset if they want their valuables are you're not on to tp them.... No, it wouldn't. Kids don't trade through enderchests... and if they've hidden the item in their enderchest, we can get into it...
This doesn't have to do with an enderchest plugin I'm saying hypothetically its like and enderchest plus Lockette going down doesn't have to do with this because tht could happen with anything but for besides we could easily find who griefs and who doesn't for we have tons of coop members who would be constantly monitoring with frapps
If this became a warp, it wouldn't be at your island (you said your coops) and I highly doubt people are going to want to sit at the warp all day with Frapps just to watch for griefs or abusers, so it would still be very un-monitored. Secondly, the reason it'd be an issue for if lockette goes down is there would be large amounts of looting in one area, causing even more work for mods than if it happened with out this idea. It would be far too much of a risk in this kind of occurrence. Thirdly, there's still the issue that if this were to be implemented there would need to be thousands of double chests and there'd need to be a way of knowing who owns which one without having to go and look at the name of each and every chest. I listed three fairly serious issues even with this not being enderchests and you're kind of just blowing it off like it doesn't matter. The point of making a suggestion is to get this kind of feedback and you're not giving it much heed, despite asking for feedback.
I don't not like the idea, I just don't see the point. It just seems like something extra to potentially go wrong/cause problems. I cannot see the need for it.