[Global] Editting Offline Player's Inventories

First off, I would like to request how to get rid of the .NET label so that it just says [Global]. Thank you, and much appreciated.

Now moving on to my suggestion
So we all know there was an incident lately where players got scammed, (I'm not naming anyone as that is plain rude) and apparently the player's payments for the competition are in the player's inventory or enderchest (can't remember) but moderators cannot edit them whilst they are offline. So is it possible to modify the plugin or add one where it is possible.

Thank you for reading.
-Kind Regards

 

I think I know the player that you are talking about . I like this idea since I want the players to get their refunds.

 

Haha. Thanks for supporting!

 

Support.;ppppppppppppppppppp;

 

Idk if that's possible seeing as how Essentials is built. Probably would require a new plugin and a MySQL database in order to store the inventory-data

 

Yes please! Much Support.

 

support. more words to post

 

Support. It'd be useful

 

No. This would require: When the user logs out, reads & writes the user's inventory when they logged out. To modify: reading to open the inventory, and writing to edit it. So many inventories would be stored, that it would lag the server if the inventories aren't stored on a database and on the server.

 

I have seen this command in other servers and it does not cause lag.

 

Support, when people get scammed the person that scammed them goes offline for a while so the player that got scammed forgets about it. It would be nice if a moderator can take the item out of their inventory or enderchest so you can get your refund and for them to get banned. This will be a big part to help scams so it is easier to get your items back.

 

"if the inventories aren't stored on a database"

 

~Done

I like this idea, support (;

 

Yea:

 

luckynumber56 please explain why this would be a bad idea, thank you

Thank you all for the continued support

 

Support. Will be useful <:

 

Yes.. That's true.

 

The idea isn't necessarily bad, I do see your points and they would be hit. I feel the bad will outweigh the good however, i.e. lag and (imo) this won't be as frequently necessary to make up for it.

 

sql databases sql databases sql databases