Resolved Help

why was yet another one of my messages deleted?

 

If I had to guess this would be this:
[READ before Posting]Information for leaving Feedback | Skyblock Forums
" Avoid just replying with "support"or "no support". Please write actual feedback, otherwise just use the ratings provided"

Due to you just replying "no support" without leaving any feedback for the applicant, I am assuming that is why your post was deleted.

Although I don't know for sure, you will want to ask a staff member for certain, this is just a rough guess.


To avoid this in the future, try to leave a statement explaining the reasoning about your decision, or just some things you have noted about how they behave or your personal opinion on why you feel that way.

 

I think you need to have a reason next to the "No Support" you said in order your post to be reasonsable,

Otherwise it would be seen as post farming.

 

ok then why did 30 of my reports for this reason get denied?

Agent p.jm

 

It's because they have no other options but only option is to delete it, but they ask you to put a reason in a suggestion after deleting it.

 

I believe the main reason being that you actually have to say why you support/no support/partial support with the applicant. If not the mods will most likely see it as post farming

 

English?

 

What he was saying is you cant just write support or no support

 

why'd he say that in response to my question, which asks why my 30 reports, that I made for that exact reason, got denied?

 

There is a very clear difference between saying "no support", supporting and re-supporting an application.

Supporting an application without saying anything isn't advised, however it could act as a bump towards the application. Feedback for supporting isn't necessary especially if people have mentioned why in previous posts. However supporting a suggestion for example (if not a bump) should come with feedback too or else people should just rate it with the provided ratings.

Re-supports usually act as a bump to the application to help show that you want the applicant to be promoted, and to bump the application to the top to allow for others to be able to see it.

No-supporting an application, especially if you haven't said anything prior, and without adding WHY you no supported, is just post farming.

It is never okay to no support and not give your reasoning. You have to elaborate in order for the applicant to know why you don't want them promoted, and to help them improve if they need to. If you have nothing to say other than "no support" and not add on as to why, then don't reply in the first place.

You've done this numerous times. Might be best to actually tell Eunice why you no-supported instead.

 

The whole point of my "no-support" message was to prove a point, which has in-fact been proven to me. I made 30~ reports, all of which were made on people who said any of the following three things; "Support", "no-support" or "re-support". Following every single one of my reports being denied, save for one that I made about a quadruple bump if I recall, I made a post to see if mine would be deleted, and here we are. This is either obviously bias or miscommunication amongst the staff team, and I'd actually like someone, preferrably the person who deleted my message, who is a staff member to respond

 

If you just admitted that the "no-support" wasn't actually genuine, then there shouldn't be an issue here. If it's deleted and you had no reason relating to the application to say "no support" then there is no point of asking why it's deleted. Shouldn't have been there in the first place.

 

Seeing as this thread is being used to inform the poster (Salvation) I think examples are great, Kerahna! I feel I also have the right to ask a question on this thread as that's what it's turned into:

Basically what you said (in a relevant format to this thread) is if someone posts support or no-support without reason you delete the post and warn them to stop. They most likely didn't read the forum rules. If someone files 30 reports against others for something AGAINST the rules you do what was stated above, but if the person who knows the rules breaks that same rule they'll get banned.

That's a great example, but He READ the rules and KNEW the rules, made the reports, and they all got denied? He then made a support ticket and asked why, to where he was told that staff don't punish for that, so now Salvation is misinformed DUE TO YOUR STAFF TEAM.

You also say staff can choose what they punish for, that's great. Don't reply to tickets, questions and reports about a rule you don't enforce, not complicated as you don't enforce that but someone else on the team does. You then fault Salvation for the lack of coordination ON YOUR STAFF TEAM! This should've never been a problem as the reports would've gotten accepted/denied, if denied Salvation would've made a ticket and been told it's staff's choice.

You claim it's a trap and that's why it was deleted, please tell me how you came to this conclusion? Were you actually shocked when you found out a NEWER member of the forums broke a rule he was just told wasn't punishable? He did admit (after it was deleted) it was because he knew staff had a bias against him and would delete it, I agree that's wrong. You know what I also think is wrong? A staff team that doesn't know what and what not they punish for...

This is not to bash anyone, but rather relevant questions with needed context. I understand where you're coming from, just as you should understand where I'm coming from. Consistency is key and maybe then you won't have people trying to catch your staff team in traps... Anyways if you could reply to this that would be awesome as I am actually curious and want to side with the staff team whilst seeing where Salvation is coming from.